✍️ WAT Concepts

IIM Bangalore WAT Topics: 15% Weightage Guide with Sample Outlines (2024-25)

Master IIM Bangalore WAT topics with the highest 15% weightage. Get actual 2024 topics, sample outlines, evaluator insights, and practice questions for IIM-B calls.

by
🎯

What You’ll Learn

  1. IIM Bangalore WAT Topics: Why 15% Weightage Changes Everything
  2. WAT Topics for IIM: School-by-School Comparison
  3. WAT Topics for IIM 2024: Verified Actual Questions
  4. WAT Topics Asked in IIM Interviews 2024
  5. IIM WAT Topics 2024 with Sample Outlines
  6. Practice WAT Topics for IIM Calls
  7. GD vs WAT Importance in IIM Admissions
  8. GD Topics Asked in IIM Interviews
  9. WAT Abstract Topics: IIM-B’s Occasional Curveballs
  10. IIM-B Evaluation Criteria & Scoring Secrets
  11. Sample Responses That Scored 8+ at IIM-B

Evaluators at IIM Bangalore mark 400 WAT sheets in 3-4 hours. That’s approximately 30 seconds per essay. Your first 3 lines and overall structure determine whether you land in the “read carefully” pile or the “scan and score” pile.

Here’s what makes IIM Bangalore WAT topics uniquely important: IIM-B assigns 15% weightage to WAT—the highest among all IIMs. Compare that to IIM-A’s 10% or IIM-C’s 10%. This isn’t a marginal difference. In a competitive pool where candidates are separated by 1-2 points, the difference between a 6/10 and 8/10 in WAT can swing your final composite by 3+ points.

15%
WAT Weightage (Highest Among All IIMs)
20 min
Time Limit | 250-300 Words
<2%
Candidates Score 9+/10
⚠️ Critical: IIM-B WAT Can Make or Break Your Admission

With 15% weightage, the difference between a 6/10 and 8/10 in WAT equals a 3-point swing in your final composite. In IIM-B’s competitive pool, this can literally determine your admit. IIM-B evaluators are known to be STRICT on grammar and value logical consistency over creative flair. Policy-focused topics dominate. Prepare accordingly.

IIM Bangalore WAT Topics: Why 15% Weightage Changes Everything

Understanding what makes IIM Bangalore WAT topics distinct from other IIMs helps you prepare strategically. IIM-B has a unique institutional culture that shapes their WAT expectations—and knowing this gives you an edge over candidates who prepare generically.

What Makes IIM-B WAT Different from Other IIMs

1
Policy-Heavy Topics
IIM-B consistently asks about governance, policy trade-offs, and economic reasoning. Topics like “Presidential vs Parliamentary system,” “Population control policy,” and “Economic growth vs sustainability” are classic IIM-B style.

This reflects IIM-B’s public policy orientation and strong finance/consulting culture.
2
Logic Over Creativity
Unlike IIM-K which rewards playfulness and poetic interpretation, IIM-B values structured argumentation. They want to see: clear thesis → supporting evidence → counter-argument → synthesis.

Think like a policy analyst, not a creative writer.
3
Grammar Strictness
IIM-B evaluators are notoriously strict on grammar. A well-argued essay with grammatical errors will score 1-2 points lower than expected. Proofread your essay—leave 2-3 minutes for review.

Clarity beats complexity. Simple, error-free sentences > convoluted ones.
4
15% Weightage Reality
This isn’t just a formality. With 15% weightage, WAT preparation for IIM-B should be proportionally higher than for other IIMs. A 2-point improvement in WAT equals 3+ points in final composite.

Invest preparation time accordingly—this is where marginal gains compound.
Coach’s Perspective
Here’s what students miss about IIM-B WAT: they think it’s about opinions, but it’s about reasoning quality. When IIM-B asks “Should India have a Presidential system?”, they’re not checking your political preference. They’re testing: Can you analyze governance structures? Can you see trade-offs? Can you propose a nuanced position with specific evidence? The essay is an analytical exercise, not a debate club performance. Apply the Verb Test: if your conclusion has no verbs specifying WHO does WHAT, you’ve written vague nonsense.

IIM Bangalore WAT Format at a Glance

Parameter IIM Bangalore Why It Matters
Duration 20 minutes Mid-range; allows for planning + writing + review
Word Limit 250-300 words Every word must count; exceeding by >50 words = 2-mark deduction
Weightage 15% (HIGHEST) Can swing final composite by 3+ points
Topic Style Policy, current affairs, occasional abstract Prepare with economic/policy reasoning frameworks
Evaluation Style Strict on grammar, values logic Proofread twice; clarity > complexity
Time Allocation 3 min plan + 14 min write + 3 min review Planning is non-negotiable for structure

WAT Topics for IIM: School-by-School Comparison

Understanding WAT topics for IIM across different schools helps you calibrate your preparation. Each IIM has a distinct topic style and evaluation culture.

Comparative Analysis: Topic Styles Across IIMs

IIM Duration Weightage Topic Style Key Focus
IIM Bangalore 20 min 15% Policy-focused Logic, grammar strictness
IIM Ahmedabad 30 min 10% Case-based (AWT) Analytical reasoning, recommendations
IIM Calcutta 15-20 min 10% Opinion-based Grammar EXTREMELY strict
IIM Lucknow 15 min 10% Abstract Creative interpretation
IIM Kozhikode 20 min N/A HIGHLY Abstract Originality, unique angles
IIM Indore 10 min N/A Current affairs SPEED (fastest WAT)
XLRI 20 min Combined Ethics-focused Values, social responsibility
💡 Strategic Insight

If you have multiple IIM calls, prioritize IIM-B WAT preparation because of the 15% weightage. But recognize that IIM-B style (policy, logic) differs fundamentally from IIM-K style (abstract, creative) and IIM-A style (case-based, analytical). Prepare topic banks calibrated for each school’s style rather than using one generic approach.

What Each IIM Really Tests Through WAT

B
IIM-B: Can You Think Like a Policy Analyst?
Trade-off analysis, stakeholder perspectives, economic reasoning, structured argumentation. They want to see systems thinking applied to complex problems.
A
IIM-A: Can You Solve a Business Problem?
Case diagnosis, recommendation with justification, data-driven reasoning. AWT format tests consulting-style thinking.
K
IIM-K/L: Can You Think Differently?
Original interpretation, creative connections, philosophical depth. “Blue is better than Yellow” tests lateral thinking.
X
XLRI: Do You Have a Moral Compass?
Values-based reasoning, ethical trade-offs, social responsibility. Jesuit institution tests character, not just intellect.

WAT Topics for IIM 2024: Verified Actual Questions

Here are WAT topics for IIM 2024 that were actually asked in the most recent admission cycle. These are verified through candidate reports and post-interview discussions.

IIM Bangalore Actual Topics (2024-25)

Topic Category Key Tension Difficulty
“Should India have a Presidential system?” Governance Stability vs Representation ★★★
“Is social media a threat to democracy?” Tech-Politics Free speech vs Misinformation ★★
“Should India adopt a population control policy?” Policy Resource management vs Individual rights ★★
“Is economic growth compatible with environmental sustainability?” Environment-Economy Development vs Ecology ★★
“Remote work: Temporary trend or permanent shift?” Business-Society Flexibility vs Collaboration ★★

Other IIMs: Actual 2024 Topics for Comparison

IIM Ahmedabad (AWT – Case-Based):

  • “A tech startup has 18 months runway. Pivot, raise, or sell?”
  • “Company faces 30% attrition. Diagnose and recommend.”
  • “E-commerce company: Quick commerce vs profitability trade-off.”
  • “Pricing dilemma for a SaaS company entering India.”

Style: Business cases requiring structured analysis + clear recommendation

IIM Calcutta (Opinion-Based):

  • “Is higher education overrated?”
  • “Should voting be made compulsory in India?”
  • “The rise of gig economy: Opportunity or exploitation?”
  • “Is meritocracy a myth?”
  • “Technology connects but isolates.”

Style: Clear stance required, grammar EXTREMELY strict

IIM Kozhikode (Highly Abstract):

  • “Blue is better than Yellow” (2023)
  • “If a tree falls in a forest…”
  • “The space between words”
  • “The sound of one hand clapping”
  • “Everything old is new again”

Style: Philosophical interpretation, creativity rewarded

XLRI (Ethics-Focused):

  • “Is profit compatible with purpose?”
  • “Does corporate social responsibility go far enough?”
  • “The ethical implications of AI in hiring”
  • “Can business be a force for good?”
  • “Should companies take political stands?”

Style: Values-based reasoning, balance profit and ethics

Coach’s Perspective
Notice the pattern in IIM-B topics: they present false dichotomies. “Presidential vs Parliamentary,” “Growth vs Sustainability,” “Social media: threat or enabler?” Most students fall into the trap of picking a side. The smart approach: challenge the binary framing. Show evaluators you understand that complex policy questions rarely have either/or answers. The real insight often lies in synthesizing apparent opposites—sustainable growth models, hybrid governance structures, regulated digital spaces.

WAT Topics Asked in IIM Interviews 2024

Here’s a comprehensive compilation of WAT topics asked in IIM interviews 2024 across multiple institutions. These represent verified topics from the most recent admission cycle.

Category-Wise Topic Distribution (2024-25)

Category Frequency Most Common At Example Topics
Policy & Governance 35% IIM-B, IIM-C Presidential system, UBI, reservations
Abstract/Philosophical 25% IIM-K, IIM-L Sound of silence, Blue vs Yellow
Technology & Society 20% IIM-B, IIM-A AI regulation, social media, privacy
Business & Economy 12% IIM-A (AWT) Startup bubble, gig economy, privatization
Ethics & Values 8% XLRI, SPJIMR Profit vs purpose, corporate activism

IIM Bangalore: Complete Topic Bank (2023-25)

IIM-B Verified & Predicted Topics
Track your practice
  • Governance: Should India have a Presidential system?
  • Tech-Politics: Is social media a threat to democracy?
  • Policy: Should India adopt a population control policy?
  • Environment: Is economic growth compatible with sustainability?
  • Business: Remote work: Temporary trend or permanent shift?
  • Policy: Should India implement Universal Basic Income?
  • Economy: Is the startup ecosystem in a bubble?
  • Governance: One Nation One Election: Good or bad?
  • Technology: Should AI development be regulated?
  • Labor: Gig economy: Opportunity or exploitation?
💡 Trend Alert: Abstract Topics Rising

62% of 2025 WAT topics were abstract vs 38% current affairs (shifted from 45-55 split in 2022). IIMs increasingly want to see how you think, not what news you’ve read. Even policy-focused IIM-B occasionally throws abstract topics. Don’t neglect abstract topic preparation.

IIM WAT Topics 2024 with Sample Outlines

Here are IIM WAT topics 2024 with sample outlines specifically designed for IIM Bangalore’s policy-focused, logic-first evaluation style. Use these as templates for structuring your own responses.

The IIM-B Essay Formula

🎯 The Winning Structure

HOOK → THESIS → ARGUMENT + EXAMPLE → COUNTER → SYNTHESIS

Time allocation (20 min): Plan (3 min) + Write (14 min) + Review (3 min)
Word budget (250 words): Opening (50) + Body (100) + Counter (60) + Conclusion (40)

Sample Outline 1: “Should India have a Presidential system?”

📝 IIM-B Actual Topic (2024) – Full Outline

HOOK (2 sentences, ~40 words):

“India’s parliamentary system has delivered 17 governments in 75 years—stability that neighboring presidential democracies have struggled to achieve. Yet critics resurface whenever coalition politics creates policy gridlock.”

Fact-based hook + acknowledges the debate context. Immediately shows you know the landscape.

THESIS (1 sentence, ~25 words):

“While presidential systems offer executive stability, India’s diversity makes parliamentary representation essential—the question isn’t which system, but which reforms.”

Clear position that avoids binary thinking. Shows nuance.

ARGUMENT (2-3 sentences, ~60 words):

“Parliamentary systems ensure executive accountability through no-confidence motions—a check absent in presidential systems. India’s 28 states and 22 official languages require the coalition-building that parliamentary democracy enables. The US experience shows presidential gridlock can paralyze governance.”

Three distinct points with implicit evidence.

COUNTER (2 sentences, ~50 words):

“Presidential advocates argue that directly-elected executives have clearer mandates and cannot be held hostage by coalition partners. However, this stability can become rigidity—Brazil’s presidential impeachments show the system isn’t immune to crisis.”

Acknowledges counter, then rebuts with international evidence.

CONCLUSION (2 sentences, ~45 words):

“The answer isn’t importing an American model but strengthening Indian democracy: Parliament must reform anti-defection law. States must strengthen Panchayati Raj. Our system needs surgery, not transplant.”

Specific proposals with Verb Test passed. Memorable closer.
Total: ~220 words | 3 min planning | 14 min writing | 3 min review

Sample Outline 2: “Is social media a threat to democracy?”

📝 IIM-B Actual Topic (2024) – Full Outline

HOOK:

“In 2018, WhatsApp rumors killed 30+ Indians in mob lynchings. In 2024, deepfake videos of political leaders reached millions before fact-checkers could respond.”

Specific Indian examples—not generic global references. Shows you know the local context.

THESIS:

“Social media amplifies democracy’s vulnerabilities but didn’t create them—the threat isn’t the technology but our failure to regulate it while preserving free expression.”

Nuanced position showing sophisticated thinking.

ARGUMENT:

“Algorithmic amplification creates filter bubbles. Misinformation spreads 6x faster than facts (MIT study). Foreign interference exploits platform design. Cambridge Analytica demonstrated how micro-targeting can manipulate electoral outcomes.”

Data point + multiple arguments in compressed form.

COUNTER:

“Yet the same platforms enabled Arab Spring, #MeToo, and Indian farmers’ protests. Technology is morally neutral—censorship cures may be worse than the disease.”

Balanced counter showing you see both sides.

CONCLUSION:

“Three interventions can help: platforms must fund independent fact-checking, Election Commission must regulate political advertising, schools must teach digital literacy. The goal isn’t making social media safe for democracy—it’s making citizens resilient.”

Three specific proposals with actors and actions. Verb Test passed.
Total: ~230 words | Verb Test: 3 specific actions with responsible parties

Sample Outline 3: “Is economic growth compatible with environmental sustainability?”

📝 IIM-B Actual Topic (2024) – Full Outline

HOOK:

“India’s solar power now costs ₹2.5/kWh versus ₹4/kWh for new coal. The question isn’t whether green growth is possible, but whether we’re willing to redesign how growth happens.”

Data-driven hook that challenges the premise of the debate.

THESIS:

“The growth-environment trade-off is increasingly a false dichotomy—sustainable development isn’t compromise but necessity, though the real tension is speed versus equity.”

Challenges the false dichotomy while identifying the REAL tension.

ARGUMENT:

“Renewable energy creates more jobs per MW than fossil fuels. Green hydrogen, battery storage, and circular economy represent trillion-dollar opportunities. The EU’s carbon border tax makes sustainability economically necessary for Indian exports.”

Economic reasoning that IIM-B values highly.

COUNTER:

“Developing nations face legitimate concerns: coal employs 4 million Indians, green transitions require capital-intensive investment, and climate deadlines were set by nations that industrialized without constraint.”

Shows awareness of development equity argument.

CONCLUSION:

“Government must fund just transition programs for coal workers. Industry must decarbonize supply chains. Consumers must demand transparency. The question isn’t growth versus environment—it’s redesigning growth for the century ahead.”

Three stakeholders, three actions—Verb Test passed.
Total: ~240 words | Framework: Challenge premise → Real tension → Multi-stakeholder solution
Coach’s Perspective
The Verb Test is your secret weapon for IIM-B. When you write “India needs better policies” you’ve said nothing actionable. When you write “Parliament must reform the anti-defection law, states must strengthen local governance, Election Commission must regulate campaign spending”—you’ve demonstrated that you can think in actionable terms. IIM-B values this because they’re training future managers who must propose specific solutions, not describe problems vaguely. Every conclusion should pass this test: WHO does WHAT and HOW?

Practice WAT Topics for IIM Calls

Here are practice WAT topics for IIM calls specifically calibrated for different IIM styles. Use these for systematic preparation.

IIM-B Style: Policy & Governance (15 Topics)

# Topic Key Framework Difficulty
1 Should India implement Universal Basic Income? Stakeholder analysis ★★★
2 Is reservation policy achieving its objectives? Means vs ends ★★★
3 Should voting be made compulsory in India? Rights vs duties ★★
4 Is coalition government good for India? Trade-off analysis ★★
5 Should India adopt One Nation One Election? Federal structure ★★★
6 Is the Indian judiciary too activist? Separation of powers ★★★
7 Should all PSUs be privatized? Economic efficiency ★★
8 Is federalism under threat in India? Center-state dynamics ★★★
9 Should India have term limits for Prime Minister? Democratic stability ★★
10 Should India adopt a Uniform Civil Code? Unity vs diversity ★★★
11 Is the gig economy exploitative or liberating? Labor rights ★★
12 Should AI development be regulated? Innovation vs safety ★★
13 Is privacy dead in the digital age? Rights framework ★★
14 Should India ban cryptocurrency? Financial policy ★★
15 Is Make in India achieving its objectives? Policy evaluation ★★

4-Week Practice Schedule for IIM-B

Structured WAT Preparation Plan
20 essays with mentor review
📅 Week 1
Policy & Governance
  • Presidential vs Parliamentary system
  • Universal Basic Income
  • Coalition government
  • Reservation policy
  • Judicial activism
📅 Week 2
Economy & Business
  • Startup bubble
  • Privatization of PSUs
  • Gig economy
  • Make in India
  • Remote work future
📅 Week 3
Technology & Society
  • Social media & democracy
  • AI regulation
  • Privacy in digital age
  • Deepfakes & misinformation
  • Digital divide
📅 Week 4
Mixed Practice + Review
  • Random topic selection (timed)
  • Abstract topic practice
  • Review all 20 essays for patterns
  • Mock WAT under exam conditions
  • Final grammar check drill
Coach’s Perspective
20-30 mentor-reviewed essays is the sweet spot. After 3-4 essays, your patterns become clear—recurring weaknesses, go-to examples, structural tendencies. Quality of feedback matters more than quantity of essays. Better to write 20 essays with detailed feedback than 50 essays with no review. Find ONE sustained mentor over 12 weeks, not multiple conflicting voices. The goal isn’t to become a different writer—it’s to become a clearer version of yourself.

GD vs WAT Importance in IIM Admissions

Understanding GD vs WAT importance in IIM admissions is crucial for strategic preparation. The landscape has shifted dramatically in recent years.

The Great Shift: Why IIMs Moved from GD to WAT

1
Evaluation Reliability
GDs are chaotic—evaluators struggled to fairly assess 8-10 candidates speaking simultaneously. WAT provides a standardized, reviewable artifact that can be independently evaluated by multiple graders.
2
Testing Thinking Quality
GDs often rewarded aggression and volume over quality of thought. WAT tests sustained argumentation—can you build a coherent position over 250 words, not just throw out 4-5 points?
3
COVID Acceleration
Virtual GDs proved logistically difficult. WAT could be administered remotely. Even as interviews returned to campus, IIMs retained WAT because it proved more useful for evaluation.
4
Career Relevance
MBA programs recognized that written communication (emails, reports, presentations) matters more in corporate careers than real-time debate. WAT tests what managers actually do daily.

Current Status: GD vs WAT at Top Schools (2024-25)

School GD Status WAT Status Weightage
IIM Bangalore ❌ No GD ✅ WAT (20 min) WAT: 15%
IIM Ahmedabad ❌ No GD ✅ AWT (30 min) AWT: 10%
IIM Calcutta ❌ No GD (usually) ✅ WAT (15-20 min) WAT: 10%
IIM Lucknow ❌ No GD ✅ WAT (15 min) WAT: 10%
XLRI ⚠️ Sometimes GD ✅ WAT Combined
SPJIMR ✅ GE (Group Exercise) ✅ Essay Combined 50%
✅ Prioritize WAT Because…
  • Most top IIMs have replaced GD with WAT
  • WAT weightage is explicit (15% at IIM-B)
  • Written skills transfer to MBA coursework and career
  • WAT preparation improves PI answers (same frameworks)
  • Your essay can be reviewed by panelists before PI
⚠️ Don’t Completely Ignore GD Because…
  • Some schools (XLRI, SPJIMR) still use GD/GE
  • GD skills help in PI (articulation, quick thinking)
  • Corporate careers require group communication
  • GD topics make excellent WAT practice material
  • Frameworks work for both formats
Coach’s Perspective
The same frameworks work for both GDs and WATs—PESTLE, stakeholder analysis, pros-cons. The difference is execution. In a GD, you make 4-6 short points over 15 minutes in conversation with 8-10 others. In WAT, you build ONE sustained argument over 250 words. GD tests quick thinking and social intelligence. WAT tests structured argumentation. Practice GD topics as WAT essays—it’s the same content, different delivery format.

GD Topics Asked in IIM Interviews

While most IIMs have moved to WAT, understanding GD topics asked in IIM interviews is still valuable. These topics work excellently as WAT practice material.

Classic GD Topics (Use as WAT Practice)

  1. Should India shift to a Presidential system?
  2. One Nation One Election: Good or bad for federalism?
  3. Is the Indian judiciary too activist?
  4. Should voting be made compulsory?
  5. Is coalition government good for India?
  6. Should there be term limits for Prime Minister?
  7. Is reservation policy still relevant?
  8. Should India adopt a Uniform Civil Code?
  9. Is federalism under threat in India?
  10. Should India decriminalize marijuana?
  1. Is the startup ecosystem in a bubble?
  2. Should India adopt protectionism or free trade?
  3. Is the gig economy exploitative or liberating?
  4. Should PSUs be privatized?
  5. Is Make in India achieving its objectives?
  6. Should India ban cryptocurrency?
  7. Is profit the only responsibility of business?
  8. Should companies take political stands?
  9. Is disruption overrated?
  10. Remote work: Opportunity or threat to collaboration?
  1. Is social media a threat to democracy?
  2. Should AI development be regulated?
  3. Is meritocracy a myth?
  4. Technology connects but isolates
  5. Is higher education overrated?
  6. Should there be limits to free speech?
  7. Is cancel culture a force for good?
  8. Climate action vs economic growth
  9. Is privacy dead in the digital age?
  10. Work-life balance: Myth or achievable?

Converting GD Topics to WAT Essays

Aspect GD Approach WAT Approach
Content 4-6 short points across 15 min 1 sustained argument over 250 words
Structure Flexible, responsive to others Fixed: Hook → Thesis → Argument → Counter → Conclusion
Depth vs Breadth Breadth (cover multiple angles) Depth (one well-developed position)
Examples Quick references, 1-2 sentences Developed examples with context
Stance Can evolve through discussion Must be clear by sentence 2-3
Evaluation Communication + content + behavior Content + structure + language + critical thinking

WAT Abstract Topics: IIM-B’s Occasional Curveballs

While IIM Bangalore predominantly asks policy topics, WAT abstract topics occasionally appear. The 2025 trend shows abstract topics increasing across all IIMs (62% vs 38% current affairs). You must be prepared.

Abstract Topics Spectrum: From IIM-K to IIM-B

Abstraction Level Examples Primary School IIM-B Likelihood
Highly Abstract “Blue is better than Yellow” IIM Kozhikode 5%
Philosophical “The sound of silence” IIM Lucknow 10%
Semi-Abstract “Technology connects but isolates” IIM Calcutta 20%
Policy-Adjacent “Remote work: Temporary or permanent?” IIM Bangalore 65%

How to Handle Abstract Topics at IIM-B

1
Find the Business/Policy Angle
IIM-B values practical application. “Knowledge is power” → Write about data economy, not philosophical musings. “United we stand” → Write about federalism or coalition governments, not abstract unity.
2
Use Concrete Examples
Even for abstract topics, IIM-B wants evidence. “Change is constant” → Reference Kodak, Nokia, or India’s economic liberalization. Make the abstract tangible.
3
Maintain Structure
Don’t let abstract topics make you lose structure. Still follow: Hook → Thesis → Argument → Counter → Conclusion. The topic is abstract; your response shouldn’t be rambling.
4
Apply the “Yes, And” Principle
From improv comedy: never reject what you’re given. Accept the premise and build on it. If you get “Blue is better than Yellow”—don’t panic. Find an angle: market positioning? Political branding? Economic signals? Build from there.

Abstract Topics That Could Appear at IIM-B

Abstract Topic IIM-B Interpretation (Business/Policy)
“The pen is mightier than the sword” Soft power in diplomacy, media’s role in democracy, IP value
“Change is the only constant” Disruption in business, adaptive leadership, regulatory evolution
“Knowledge is power” Data economy, education policy, information asymmetry
“United we stand, divided we fall” Federalism, coalition politics, trade blocs, team dynamics
“The road less traveled” First-mover advantage, contrarian investing, innovation strategy
“Time is money” Productivity economics, time poverty, gig economy pricing
⚠️ IIM-B Abstract Topic Strategy

At IIM Kozhikode, you might write poetically about “Blue is better than Yellow.” At IIM Bangalore, you’d better connect it to market positioning, political party branding, or color psychology in business. IIM-B rewards practical application over creative abstraction. Always find the business, policy, or economic angle.

IIM-B Evaluation Criteria & Scoring Secrets

Understanding how IIM Bangalore actually evaluates WAT helps you focus preparation on what matters for scoring.

Official Scoring Breakdown

Criterion Weightage What They Look For IIM-B Specifics
Content Quality 30-40% Depth of analysis, relevance to topic Policy reasoning, economic logic
Structure & Organization 25-30% Clear intro-body-conclusion, logical flow Paragraph breaks visible, scannable
Language & Communication 20-25% Grammar, clarity, vocabulary STRICT on errors; clarity > complexity
Critical Thinking 15-20% Multiple perspectives, balanced analysis Counter-arguments, nuanced positions

Score Distribution Reality

9-10
1-2% candidates | Exceptional, memorable
7-8
15-20% candidates | Strong, well-structured
5-6
50-60% candidates | Average, forgettable

What Gets 9+ at IIM Bangalore

9+/10 Requirements Checklist
All must be present
  • Hook: Opening that makes evaluator stop and read carefully
  • Thesis: Clear position stated within first 2-3 sentences
  • Evidence: At least one specific, named, accurate example
  • Counter: Counter-argument acknowledged and addressed
  • Insight: Original thinking (something evaluator hasn’t read 50 times)
  • Grammar: Perfect grammar and spelling (IIM-B is strict)
  • Conclusion: Memorable closer with specific actions (Verb Test passed)

The Evaluator’s Reality

👁️
Inside the IIM-B Marking Room
What actually happens to your essay
The Process
4-6 evaluators mark 400 sheets in 3-4 hours. Each essay is marked by 2 evaluators independently. Scores are averaged; if >2 point difference, a third evaluator is called. Candidate identity is masked during evaluation.
4-6 sec
First Scan (Pile Sorting)
60-90 sec
Top Pile (Detailed Read)
20-30 sec
Average Pile (Quick Confirm)

Sample Responses That Scored 8+ at IIM-B

Here are fully annotated essays that would score well at IIM Bangalore. Study the structure, the evidence, and the Verb Test application.

Sample 1: “Should India have a Presidential system?” (8.5/10)

✅ Score: 8.5/10 | 265 words | Time: 17 min

India’s parliamentary system has delivered 17 governments in 75 years—stability that neighboring presidential democracies have struggled to achieve. Yet the question resurfaces whenever coalition politics creates policy gridlock.

Fact-based hook + acknowledges debate context

While presidential systems offer executive stability, India’s diversity makes parliamentary representation essential—the answer lies not in system change but institutional reform.

Clear thesis by sentence 3, nuanced but decisive

Parliamentary systems ensure executive accountability through no-confidence motions—a check absent in presidential systems. India’s 28 states and 22 official languages require the coalition-building that parliamentary democracy enables. The US experience shows presidential gridlock can paralyze governance—government shutdowns are constitutionally impossible in India.

Three distinct arguments + specific international comparison

Presidential advocates argue that directly-elected executives have clearer mandates and cannot be held hostage by coalition partners. However, this stability can become rigidity—Brazil’s presidential impeachments and Peru’s constitutional chaos show the system isn’t immune to crisis.

Strong counter acknowledged, then rebutted with evidence

The answer isn’t importing an American model but strengthening Indian democracy: Parliament must reform the Tenth Schedule. States must strengthen Panchayati Raj. The Election Commission must cap campaign spending. Our system needs surgery, not transplant.

Specific proposals with Verb Test + memorable closer
Why it works: Policy-focused, logical structure, specific evidence, Verb Test passed, memorable conclusion

Sample 2: “Is social media a threat to democracy?” (8/10)

✅ Score: 8/10 | 248 words | Time: 16 min

In 2018, WhatsApp rumors killed 30+ Indians in mob lynchings. In 2024, deepfake videos of political leaders reached millions before fact-checkers could respond. The threat isn’t hypothetical—it’s documented.

Specific Indian examples, not generic global references

Social media amplifies democracy’s vulnerabilities but didn’t create them—the threat isn’t the technology but our failure to regulate it while preserving free expression.

Nuanced thesis showing sophisticated thinking

Algorithmic amplification creates filter bubbles. Misinformation spreads 6x faster than facts (MIT study). Foreign interference exploits platform design. Cambridge Analytica demonstrated how micro-targeting can manipulate electoral outcomes.

Data point + multiple arguments compressed efficiently

Yet the same platforms enabled Arab Spring, #MeToo, and Indian farmers’ protests. Technology is morally neutral—censorship cures may be worse than the disease.

Balanced counter with concrete examples

Three interventions can help: platforms must fund independent fact-checking, the Election Commission must regulate political advertising, and schools must teach digital literacy. The goal isn’t making social media safe for democracy—it’s making citizens resilient.

Three specific proposals with actors and actions
Verb Test: 3 specific actions with responsible parties clearly identified

Common Mistakes to Avoid (What Gets 5/10)

❌ Score: 5/10 | Problems Highlighted

“According to the Oxford Dictionary, democracy is defined as…”

Dictionary openings = instant eye-roll from evaluators

“In my opinion, social media has both advantages and disadvantages…”

“In my opinion” appears in 87% of essays—evaluators dislike it. Show opinion through argument, don’t announce it.

“Various experts have different views on this topic…”

Vague, no specific names or positions. Shows you don’t actually know the debate.

“In conclusion, both sides have merit and it depends on the situation…”

Fence-sitting. Shows you can’t take a reasoned position. This is what IIM-B hates most.
These patterns appear in 50-60% of average essays. Avoid them completely.
🎯
Key Takeaways
  • 1
    15% Weightage Demands Proportional Preparation
    IIM-B gives WAT the highest weightage among all IIMs. A 2-point improvement equals 3+ points in your final composite. Invest preparation time accordingly.
  • 2
    Policy Topics Dominate IIM-B
    Unlike IIM-K (highly abstract) or IIM-A (case-based), IIM-B asks governance, economic policy, and tech-politics topics. Prepare frameworks for policy analysis.
  • 3
    Logic Over Creativity
    IIM-B values structured argumentation and economic reasoning over creative flair. Think like a policy analyst, not a poet.
  • 4
    Grammar Strictness is Real
    IIM-B evaluators are notoriously strict on grammar. Leave 2-3 minutes for proofreading. Simple, error-free sentences beat convoluted complex ones.
  • 5
    Use the Verb Test
    “India needs better governance” is vague. “Parliament must reform anti-defection law, states must strengthen Panchayati Raj” is actionable. IIM-B rewards specific proposals.
  • 6
    Challenge False Dichotomies
    “Growth vs sustainability” or “Presidential vs Parliamentary”—IIM-B topics often present false binaries. Show sophistication by challenging the either/or framing.
🎯
Ready to Master IIM Bangalore WAT?
With 15% weightage, IIM-B WAT preparation can make or break your admission. Our coaching program includes 20+ IIM-B style practice essays with detailed feedback on policy reasoning, structure, grammar, and the Verb Test.
Explore Coaching Programs Browse All WAT Topics

Frequently Asked Questions

IIM-B’s institutional philosophy emphasizes structured thinking and written communication. Their strong finance and consulting placements require clear analytical writing. The 15% weightage reflects their belief that how you think in writing matters significantly for MBA success. It also helps differentiate candidates with similar CAT scores and academic profiles—your essay becomes a key differentiator.

IIM-B evaluators are among the strictest on grammar. A well-argued essay with multiple grammatical errors will score 1-2 points lower than it deserves. IIM-C is similarly strict. In contrast, IIM-K prioritizes creativity over grammatical perfection. For IIM-B, always leave 2-3 minutes for proofreading. Common errors that hurt: subject-verb disagreement, comma splices, run-on sentences, confused tenses.

No. IIM-B values nuanced positions over extreme ones. “Privatize all PSUs” or “Never privatize anything” are both weak positions. Strong essays acknowledge complexity: “Strategic sectors require state control, but operational inefficiencies in competitive sectors justify privatization with worker protection guarantees.” Take a clear position, but show you understand trade-offs. Evaluators give full marks to contrarian but logical views—the emphasis is on “logical.”

Aim for 15-20 practice essays in IIM-B style (policy/governance focus) as part of a broader 20-30 essay total. Given the 15% weightage, proportionally more preparation for IIM-B is justified if you have multiple IIM calls. After 5-6 essays, your patterns become clear. Focus on quality of feedback over quantity—better to write 20 well-reviewed essays than 40 unreviewed ones.

Sometimes yes. At IIM-B, panelists occasionally read your WAT if time permits. This means: (1) Don’t write positions you can’t defend verbally in PI, (2) Be prepared to elaborate on your WAT topic if asked, (3) Consistency between WAT and PI responses is noted. At XLRI, panelists almost always read your WAT. At IIM-A, AWT is typically scored separately and not discussed in PI.

While rare (IIM-B is 85% policy-focused), abstract topics can appear. Strategy: Find the business/policy angle. “Knowledge is power” → Write about data economy, not philosophy. “Change is constant” → Write about disruption and adaptation in business. Use concrete examples even for abstract topics. Maintain structure: Hook → Thesis → Argument → Counter → Conclusion. The topic may be abstract, but your response shouldn’t be rambling.

Leave a Comment